Guys, I think you're sort of missing the point of the suggestions board.

This is a place for suggestions that one might come up with. It is their opinion, and they will try to back it up.

Some people may back up their suggestions more ferociously than others, and some may just let it be.

Some people get angrier more quickly than others, and may even snap if they think it will get their point across.

While this may seem -pointless,- it is a suggestion nonetheless. And we all know how often suggestions from this board get put into the game.

Retiring your king for him to stay as a sub male could work, but mostly if he could just never be king.. Or maybe even be able to be changed into a female, to prevent it from becoming a king.

You have liked this post!

"Lets say someone makes a 3 year old lion king with 600 stats . With leveling and such and maybe a few egg yolks, when he's retired at age 12 with 800 stats . Since he's only 12, he stays in the pride . The cooldown until males can retire for 10 GB again is only 30 days, the player decides to keep and stat said lion until the cool down is gone and said lion ends up 1000 stats . The male is reused and therefore deaged back down to 8 years old with 1000 stats . If they plan correctly, they can continue to do this, over and over again and as Nat said end up with 10k + stats !"

Ugh. NO. How many times do I have to say that your ex-king will NOT be aged back down upon retaining kingship?

PLEASE stop saying that! You're completely contradicting what I said!

"The male is reused and therefore deaged back down to 8 years old with 1000 stats . " is INCORRECT and INVALID as I have said /multiple/ times, because no, he would NOT be de-aged back to 8! A king that has been king before will NEVER be able to de-age, EVER, even if they become king again. They will stay the SAME age as they were before becoming king again.

PLEASE listen to my posts and READ them before making the same exact statement that I de-bunked countless times!

You have liked this post!

Sooo... let me understand this. Your old king wouldn't age down to 8 but would still be on the cusp of retiring (again) after being made king... again? o.O Why on earth would anyone do that? o.O Speaking for those that don't have the GB to retire early...

I'm not really understanding the point of your suggestion if the kings don't age down... because.. it just seems like a big hassle and cluster fudge.. excuse my lewdness :x

You have liked this post!

-Shrug- Just for people who WANT their kings to still be alive, whether they plan on making them king again or not... just like any other sub-male.

However, if the player were to suddenly decide that they liked their old king better and wanted him back(assuming they retired early..), they COULD have the option of making him king again, but of course he wouldn't age down to prevent cheating, he'd be the same age. .-. So like, if he was 5 when he was retired, and he was off the throne for two years(turning 7), he would remain at age 7 when made king. Same if he was 12 when made king again.

You have liked this post!

What you're suggesting there would just be too much hassle in terms of coding, not to mention that as has been proved here, nobody really wants their old kings in their pride. What we have works and doesn't need changing.

You have liked this post!

No support for reasons previously stated, sorry. It seems too much a hassle for nothing but sentimental value, imho.

You have liked this post!

No support for reasons previously stated, sorry.

You have liked this post!

I will support just so long as your old king can't become king again.

You have liked this post!

You have liked this post!

You have liked this post!

No support. It would take a lot of coding and memory space for people to be able to do this, especially if the game needed to tag each old king as 'un-de-age-able' or however one would word that afterwords. It wouldn't really be feasible.

Everyone can have up to 5 male slots and 2 accounts. That means the game would have to tag at maximum 10 males per person as having been previous kings (since it would need to tag them us not able to be de-aged.) Even if each person saved only 1 previous king in this way, it would likely be more than the site could handle at the moment. And that's beside how complicated this would be to code (it would be very complicated, needless to say.)

Its just a ton of work to put into a nostalgic whim. Honestly, you could just RP that the King didn't really die and go from there. That's what I'm doing for my retired guy, anyway.

Aside, would the old kings be sale-able? Because that's another can of worms, either way. If they are sale-able, the game would have to publically mark that they were previously kings somewhere, and levelling kings for other players would probably become a thing. If they weren't sale-able, that's another bit of data that would have to be attached to each retired male, which would again be rather problematic.

You have liked this post!

"Lets say someone makes a 3 year old lion king with 600 stats . With leveling and such and maybe a few egg yolks, when he's retired at age 12 with 800 stats . Since he's only 12, he stays in the pride . The cooldown until males can retire for 10 GB again is only 30 days, the player decides to keep and stat said lion until the cool down is gone and said lion ends up 1000 stats . The male is reused and therefore deaged back down to 8 years old with 1000 stats . If they plan correctly, they can continue to do this, over and over again and as Nat said end up with 10k + stats !"

Ugh. NO. How many times do I have to say that your ex-king will NOT be aged back down upon retaining kingship?

PLEASE stop saying that! You're completely contradicting what I said!

"The male is reused and therefore deaged back down to 8 years old with 1000 stats . " is INCORRECT and INVALID as I have said /multiple/ times, because no, he would NOT be de-aged back to 8! A king that has been king before will NEVER be able to de-age, EVER, even if they become king again. They will stay the SAME age as they were before becoming king again.

PLEASE listen to my posts and READ them before making the same exact statement that I de-bunked countless times!

Except that's not how the system works, so they'd have to make brand new coding for this. Just to have them die in less than a year anyway. As a sub male, they could die that very day because of age anyway if you didn't retire early.

No support, sorry.

You have liked this post!

Simply make it so a previous king could not return to power, then you don't have this ruined economy?

You have liked this post!

I don't Support. It can ruin the stats of sub males being sold. You retire and he stays. Let's say you have him at 14 years. You sell him or give him to your side. Make him the new king there and repeat.

You have liked this post!

I'd support this but only if the king being retired is under 16 yrs old, all lions on Lioden die at 15-16 yrs so it wouldn't make sense to add years to his life.

Also if the retired king cannot be made king again, that wouldn't work for multiple reasons I'm sure have already been discussed.


The idea of crowning your new king but having your old king around as a sub if he has a few years of life left so that he can live them out is a nice idea imo. As long as the safeguards mentioned are in place.

You have liked this post!