Since the "no support" button has been added, I've noticed a lot of hard feelings about people pressing the "no support" button without explanation.

A potential way to fix this without completely removing the option is to add a dropdown box of potential reasons to the "no support" option.

Possible options for dropdown:
-Doesn't match theme of Lioden (This covers suggestions too unnatural for Lioden, for example)
-Makes game too difficult
-Makes game too easy
-Too much art/coding for too little purpose
-Changes core gameplay too much
-Needs more clarification (suggested by Poptart Feelzhands (#4675) )
-Reason stated in comments (with a potential ability to specify which comment)

EDIT:
Changed the wording on a couple of suggested options, and added mockups for how it'd look!

If you don't hit a button, or press "I Support!" it would look exactly the same as is now. After you hit "I DON'T Support!" though, this is what the opening post would look like at the bottom:


Here's the full dropdown with my suggested options:


Do you see that link, labelled "(Why?)"? That leads to a new page, detailing the responses of those who specified. The (Why?) button would be present regardless of which button you pressed, or whether you've supported/not supported at all:


As you can see, if you choose "Reason stated in comments" it would allow you to choose which post on the topic you're referencing. I don't know how to mock that up, though. I was picturing by post number, but those aren't visible at the moment. I assume staff'd be able to figure something out though.

Responses to concerns:

"It sounds too complicated"
-I can't speak for the coding, but the way I was picturing it, it doesn't add too much to the interface.

"You shouldn't be required to explain yourself, it'll make it too complicated to not support vs. support"
-I initially believed it should be mandatory, but people have explained this pretty well. My new mockups show it as not mandatory, and as after the press of the "no support" button.

"People will still complain about getting "no support"s even after this is implemented"
-That is true. However, I do believe getting feedback from people who prefer to remain anonymous will be helpful to many suggesters, and knowing exactly what the userbase protests to would be helpful for the admins.

"The options are too generic"
-They have to be generic for this to work. Otherwise there'd be way too many options to be useful. But, you can still cite a particular comment if the other options are too generic for you.

"It'll discourage discussion"
-While it is possible it might, it was possible the inclusion of the "no support" button in the first place might have as well. If people have something to say, they will say it. This option is mainly for people who choose to remain anonymous.