1 2 |
|
---|---|
Posted by | Include Lions in Terrritory on Leaderboard |
![]() Ember, She/They (Kokuyo) (#69092) ![]() Impeccable View Forum Posts ![]() Posted on 2016-01-23 13:26:56 |
Really a simple request. Under the Members part of the Leaderboard include who has the most lions. I've always been curious after all. If you're not supporting, please explain why because I really don't understand why you wouldn't. *This used to be territory, but this makes more sense. Territory is just GB. You still need territory to care for the lions, so this still include it in a way. The person needs to be able to take care of the lions, so the more they have the harder it will be. It will actually be an accomplishment.* |
Nykosi (#70221)
![]() Dreamboat of Ladies View Forum Posts ![]() Posted on 2016-01-23 13:34:18 |
ππΎππΈπ½ πΎπ (#16496) King of the Jungle View Forum Posts ![]() Posted on 2016-01-23 14:28:22 |
Smile Plug (#78146)
Abusive View Forum Posts ![]() Posted on 2016-01-23 15:44:42 |
Bilby [G1 penta nun 14bo] (#22185) View Forum Posts ![]() Posted on 2016-01-23 15:56:08 |
No support, territory beyond 40 is paid for, it honestly would serve no purpose other than to show off who has the most GB to invest into it as a vanity thing. Arguably the same could be said for the sub male stats leaderboard, but there could be a future purpose for that at least. ![]() |
GamingGal (#18503)
Sapphic View Forum Posts ![]() Posted on 2016-01-23 16:00:18 |
Kinda on the same train with Bilby, here. No support from me. As stated, there's really no reason for it. It's purely cosmetic. I also feel like it would be a gateway to the "Most Lions in Territory" which I feel would just be a bad road to go down. That being said, I also don't support a "Most Decor Equipped" leaderboard. The boards should at least represent something useful. That being said, I don't bother with the leaderbords that much. ![]() |
Ember, She/They (Kokuyo) (#69092) ![]() Impeccable View Forum Posts ![]() Posted on 2016-01-23 16:00:43 |
Well, the Custom Decors is similar and some of the stuff on the Leading Queens board and such could only be accomplished with a substantial supply of money too. Yet they are included on the Leaderboards. And as far usefulness, territory is what allows you to keep lions. Thanks for replying though both of you. Gives me some more to think about. Though, I don't necessarily agree. ![]() Edited on 23/01/16 @ 23:03:58 by Athene N (Vongola) (Snowblind) (#69092) |
Azzy (#9793)
![]() Blessed View Forum Posts ![]() Posted on 2016-01-24 04:05:17 |
I'm also on the No Support side of the fence. Lioden isn't a pay-to-win game, even if GB does help. But you can earn GB without buying it, and with enough effort, you can do the same thing with no GB as someone with endless bounds of it. To me, if you put "Highest Amount of Territory" on the Leaderboard, it would give off the wrong impression - because to get above 40, it's only a GB route. And this would be something that could ONLY be obtained via GB - and if it was put on the Leaderboards, I'm terrified to see how high counts would get. ![]() |
Ember, She/They (Kokuyo) (#69092) ![]() Impeccable View Forum Posts ![]() Posted on 2016-01-24 04:15:57 |
I just want to put it out there that I have calculated how much I would need to hunt my girls to get them on the Leading Queens Hunting board. Even being on for about 12 hrs a day and playing the ridiculous amount of time I do, I could not get my girls up there. I would have to have ridiculous amount of GB and SB for the period of time my hunting girl was alive. I can not get enough SB even doing all I do to skip the hunts and replenish enough. I would need GB at to be able to get the SB sell the GB. One needs a ridiculous amount. I'd say it's on par if not beyond the Territory because Territory can be slowly built up over time. So, I'd say Hunting is even worse than Territory when thought of like that. Territory can be acquired the longer you are on the game, etc. Compared to Hunting which you need all that during the lion's lifetime. Perhaps I should change this to Lions in Territory because you have to be able to take care of those lions and all those lions do have a use and purpose. ![]() |
Ember, She/They (Kokuyo) (#69092) ![]() Impeccable View Forum Posts ![]() Posted on 2016-01-24 04:19:59 |
Ok, it's been changed slightly on here. Thank you guys for saying why you don't support. It allows me to expand my ideas, change them for better, and generally improve them. ![]() |
Isabella Lena (#49545)
Impeccable View Forum Posts ![]() Posted on 2016-01-24 04:34:15 |
isknevo (#16525)
Usual View Forum Posts ![]() Posted on 2016-01-24 23:22:28 |
Territory is still capped at 100 though, right? It would just be a display of how many cubs one can obtain. New players (and even some older players) who maintain a lot of lions easily get in over their head, and the game can become less fun/more work very quickly - why encourage that, over maintaining a number of lions that fulfills your needs and keeps things fun? No support. Just ask around in chat or start a forum thread. ![]() |
Ember, She/They (Kokuyo) (#69092) ![]() Impeccable View Forum Posts ![]() Posted on 2016-01-24 23:24:45 |
I have 149 lions so there isn't a cap that I know of yet. It's still fun for me.... I've just been curious is all. ![]() |
isknevo (#16525)
Usual View Forum Posts ![]() Posted on 2016-01-24 23:38:38 |
Oh, they changed it then. For a while it was capped at 100. Thanks for the info! ![]() |
Ember, She/They (Kokuyo) (#69092) ![]() Impeccable View Forum Posts ![]() Posted on 2016-01-24 23:39:48 |
You're welcome! I think the amount of care the require tends to cap itself with most people. I'm just insane. :P ![]() Edited on 25/01/16 @ 06:40:26 by Athene N (Vongola) (Snowblind) (#69092) |
πΈ Chonk πΈ (#54568)
Deathlord of the Jungle View Forum Posts ![]() Posted on 2016-01-25 00:27:36 |
I kind of dont want my hoarding exposed like that, but then again I spend a lot decorating my lionesses and like to show them off xD Im also curious as to who has the most lions...surely there are others with more than me...right? U_U ![]() |
1 2 |
---|