Posted by Small stud racing edit... Plz look <3

Charles Carmichael (#93966)

Famous
View Forum Posts


Posted on
2018-02-16 14:16:11
I'm not a huge fan of the new ban on stud racing, so here is my idea to change that just a bit.

I think stud racing should be an option a king can put in his studding box:
h2IOMzC.png?3
If you want to allow stud races, you can check the box and if you don't want the possibility uncheck it, simple enough. It would default on unchecked, so if someone didn't know about it, they just wouldn't be able to race until they found it or where told

I'm suggesting this because sometimes its really fun to stud race, Like I did on here yesterday:
Boop.
Everyone had a blast and I offered a prize to whoever won. A fun way to get a low fert pregnant without having to pick just one stud.

Please say why if you don't support it,
Feedback is appreciated



This suggestion has 44 supports and 17 NO supports.



Hrt Icon 0 players like this post! Like?

Edited on 16/02/18 @ 14:33:52 by Tigers-Side (#93966)

Slytherin clean
fissure wine (#76271)

Toxic
View Forum Posts


Posted on
2018-02-16 14:19:37
I actually didn't mind stud racing cuz what if you have a 1% girl and the stud you chose isn't on as offer and you loose that breeding



Hrt Icon 0 players like this post! Like?

GalacticRing (#68231)

Harbinger
View Forum Posts


Posted on
2018-02-16 14:19:49
I partook in that, and it really was quite fun, even if I didn't win! A lot of people don't like stud racing, however, and this will make it easier for everyone on both sides. Support!



Hrt Icon 0 players like this post! Like?

TinaPuppy (#37760)

Lone Wanderer
View Forum Posts


Posted on
2018-02-16 14:23:06
Dupper Upper Aprove



Hrt Icon 0 players like this post! Like?

Delinquent (#93594)


View Forum Posts


Posted on
2018-02-16 14:23:56
If it's feasible to code, then I support!

Edit: I've heard Xylax said it'd be difficult to/can't be implemented, so no support!



Hrt Icon 0 players like this post! Like?


Edited on 16/02/18 @ 14:42:22 by LackeyLion (#93594)

Fading Angel (G2 2k)
[Frozen] (#81854)

Holy
View Forum Posts


Posted on
2018-02-16 14:25:15
I think they should have had a poll asking and if it was 50/50 or about that they should have just went with on/off option



Hrt Icon 0 players like this post! Like?

Bezthiel 🍉 (#81210)

Lone Wanderer
View Forum Posts


Posted on
2018-02-16 14:30:39
I am quite upset about the lack of polling over this, so hopefully one day a toggle is added. My stud had been available as an option to people who wanted to stud race, but without the ability to do so, there's little reason for me to want to keep him on the market.



Hrt Icon 0 players like this post! Like?

Pip (#96690)

King of the Jungle
View Forum Posts


Posted on
2018-02-16 14:32:23
No support. The code shouldn't be on the kings, it's on the girls. The check would be > Is out to stud, yes or no? Yes > no stud, no > can stud.

Edit: To expand, if you put a toggle on the King it would have to be 'King accepts stud racing', then each individual lioness would have to have their code changed to not only check to see if they themselves are sent out to one or more studs, they have to check to see if the King also accepts it. Which sounds easy... but to code it is a nightmare.

In Heat? > Is Fertile? > Is sent out? > Cannot send. Easy peasy. The code only has to check the lioness.

In Heat? > Is Fertile? > Is sent out > King 1 accepts racing > king 2 etc etc etc accepts racings > can send. This is much harder to check. It would have to first check the girl's status, then send a request to every potential King to see if they're able to be studded to in that circumstance. That's a breeding ground for broken code, and that's not even taking into consideration the additional coding you'd have to put in to deal with Kings who have toggled 'no stud racing' to on when a female is already sent to them. I, personally, would never attempt to code this.



Hrt Icon 0 players like this post! Like?


Edited on 16/02/18 @ 16:22:15 by Pip (#96690)

Notevy |
Çß | (#115741)

Heavenly
View Forum Posts


Posted on
2018-02-16 14:36:05
No support as this is essentially a toggle button, which Xylax himself said couldn't be added, and I doubt the update would have occurred without talking through it with the coders.



Hrt Icon 0 players like this post! Like?

Myriad [mostly
frozen] (#76)


View Forum Posts


Posted on
2018-02-16 16:18:36
In theory I wouldn’t mind a toggle, but if it’s anything like as difficult/almost impossible to actually implement as various people have said, I don’t think it's a practical solution for something only a relatively small minority would have any use for.

Especially if as Pip says it’s going to risk adding a whole lot of other problems and broken code. I’m not a coder, but I can see from that explanation that it’s way more complex than 'just add an on/off toggle' makes it sound...



Hrt Icon 0 players like this post! Like?


Edited on 16/02/18 @ 16:20:03 by Myriad (#76)

Thalath {Offline} (#41669)

Wanderer
View Forum Posts


Posted on
2018-02-16 16:20:14
Thanks, Pip; that's what I was thinking earlier but I'm not really good enough at this sort of thing to word it in such a way.

As disappointing as it'll sound, it's just not worth implementing something like this when you could really just use a Chasteberry or two, or a Black Stallion or an Angelic Blessing if you want to keep the 1% fert mut bonus, and honestly, there are much better ways to get muts.

The fees pile up quick, but muts were never meant to be dirt cheap anyway.



Hrt Icon 0 players like this post! Like?


Edited on 16/02/18 @ 16:23:54 by Thalath💞 (#41669)







Memory Used: 626.29 KB - Queries: 2 - Query Time: 0.00069 - Total Time: 0.00488s