1 |
|
---|---|
Posted by | Having to Accept Items/Lions for Transfer |
![]() woolyhorns \ g2 felis✨ (#109642) ![]() Bone Collector View Forum Posts ![]() Posted on 2018-08-09 07:25:37 |
I know that the title is confusing, but I'll explain. Sometimes it can get a tad annoying when people send me lions or items that I have no need for. While I do appreciate what the person did, I don't always have the room or items to take care of lions. For items, sometimes I don't have a need for them at all! So I suggest an idea where you have to manually accept items or lions being transferred to you. You can whitelist certain accounts if you want, or even remove the thing entirely if it doesn't work out for you. Please tell me why you wouldn't support/ Give suggestions. |
Berenos|On hiatus (#84593)
![]() Resurgent View Forum Posts ![]() Posted on 2018-08-09 07:47:58 |
I love the idea, but I've got a question. Do lions remain in the sender's account, like with trades, or do them wait in the Void to be accepted or rejected? How long could a lion "wait" as a gift before it gets cancelled if the player doesn't answer on time? I ask because it has the potential of being abused ![]() ![]() |
Mad Hyena (#29080)
![]() Necromancer View Forum Posts ![]() Posted on 2018-08-09 07:54:19 |
Hmm, maybe simply an option to have it automatically convert transfer into a Private Trade if this option is set in transfer settings? That way issue with rotting/aging will be solved, things will stay on sender's account untill trade is accepted or it expires. It is kinda how it works right now, just you have to manually create a trade if transfer is blocked. ![]() Edited on 09/08/18 @ 07:56:54 by Mad Hyena (#29080) |
🅱️oneless (#123346)
View Forum Posts ![]() Posted on 2018-08-09 07:59:22 |
Have it togglable. I don't mind receiving a random item, even if I don't have a particular need for it; I can understand other people disliking it, though. ![]() |
woolyhorns \ g2 felis✨ (#109642) ![]() Bone Collector View Forum Posts ![]() Posted on 2018-08-09 08:17:55 |
@Berenos + Mad Hyena - Forgot about it being able to be abused, maybe I'll take into consideration what both of you guys said ^^ @Asher - dont know if I made it clear enough in the suggestion, but you can disable it if you want ![]() |
1 |
---|