|
|
---|---|
Posted by | Ultrasound |
![]() Braveheart (#180192) Blessed View Forum Posts ![]() Posted on 2019-09-28 11:46:43 |
I think that the ultrasound should tell the gender of the cub. Real ultrasounds do, and it might help users make space for males instead of being like “oh bleep”, I have a male. Additions: a small 10 sB fine to see gender A small 15 sB bonus for male cubs if they were originally males and are still males to help afford them This feature should be available for the last two days of pregnancy For 300 sB, the gender of any one cub per pregnancy can be changed On the last day of the pregnancy, it should also tell if they have mutations for 100 sB 20% chance of being incorrect (if they are incorrect, there is a 80% refund |
Braveheart (#180192)
Blessed View Forum Posts ![]() Posted on 2019-09-28 12:42:02 |
Braveheart (#180192)
Blessed View Forum Posts ![]() Posted on 2019-09-28 12:42:35 |
Norte 🌹 (#174611)
Deathlord of the Jungle View Forum Posts ![]() Posted on 2019-09-28 12:45:35 |
Though I like the idea of the ultrasound predicting genders, I don't quite agree with several other things; - to be honest, 5sb seems a bit too low for such an ability. Though it shouldn't be too high, I think it should be at lest 10.. - an sb bonus? Really, no. I'm not sure how to better word my opinion, but I strongly disagree. Partly because it could be easily misused. - I see no particular reason for the feature to only be available for the last 2 days. - we have sex changers, as stated above, and those are priced differently. There is no need for a 150sb feature.. Again, very easily misusable. ![]() |
Braveheart (#180192)
Blessed View Forum Posts ![]() Posted on 2019-09-28 12:45:44 |
The falcons eye is 60 sB. Maybe a small price bump to a hundred would work. ![]() |
Braveheart (#180192)
Blessed View Forum Posts ![]() Posted on 2019-09-28 12:48:17 |
Braveheart (#180192)
Blessed View Forum Posts ![]() Posted on 2019-09-28 12:49:19 |
lily the lily (#177850)
Punk View Forum Posts ![]() Posted on 2019-09-28 12:50:40 |
Braveheart (#180192)
Blessed View Forum Posts ![]() Posted on 2019-09-28 12:52:24 |
lily the lily (#177850)
Punk View Forum Posts ![]() Posted on 2019-09-28 12:53:36 |
Braveheart (#180192)
Blessed View Forum Posts ![]() Posted on 2019-09-28 12:53:54 |
Angela |Skyward Queen| (#77401) ![]() View Forum Posts ![]() Posted on 2019-09-28 12:55:44 |
This particular reason I'm not supporting isn't exploitable, however, sex changers are an Oasis item for a reason, to generate income for the game. I don't want to see the items in the Oasis being made obsolete for that reason, and I'm sure the admins don't want that either. If you can't afford GB from real money, you can always save up your sb, as has been stated. Also, seeing if a lioness has mutated cubs before the litter is born would be game-breakingly exploitable. This would enable people to CRB the litter if it was a failure, which with high-value lions like Tigons and Leopons, would make it extremely, EXTREMELY easy to breed more of them. Don't have mutations? Just CRB the litter for 1gb and try again, and again, and again with only a 3-4 day wait in between. Much cheaper than Yohimbe barks, and it would completely kill the market for mutations that are passable for that reason. People would abuse the crap out of this. No support for those two reasons. I don't see a problem with having the genders visible for the ultrasound bat, but anything beyond that will cause extreme fluctuations in the market as a whole, which nobody should want. ![]() |
Braveheart (#180192)
Blessed View Forum Posts ![]() Posted on 2019-09-28 12:55:59 |
How about for cubs that weren’t gender changed. Tsoka did make a point tha5 it could be abused. People might start gender changing the cubs to makes, then kicking them out for the extra money ![]() |
Braveheart (#180192)
Blessed View Forum Posts ![]() Posted on 2019-09-28 13:02:10 |
Myr (#188)
![]() View Forum Posts ![]() Posted on 2019-09-28 13:02:36 |
Honestly I have to agree - the fundamental suggestion of being able to discover if cubs are male or female seems harmless, but to be blunt the rest seems either far too complicated for no particular benefit, or actively problematic in terms of gameplay or exploitability - especially the mutation aspect as Angela says. My no-support is for all the complicating factors, rather than the plain gender revealing aspect. I would change my no-support to a support just for the base suggestion, but I have a problem with too much of the rest of it as it stands. ![]() |
Braveheart (#180192)
Blessed View Forum Posts ![]() Posted on 2019-09-28 13:04:05 |
What if i create a different thing for just the base feature. I will link it 8n my next post ![]() |