due to the wording of the latest news update, "identical" to be precise, is it still alright to advertise modified rlcs by the rlc name? my current personal collection of 2/22/19 RLCs are all modified in the sense that a few of their tier 1 markings have been replaced by RMA-exclusives, as seen here. i also know that, for instance, most 10/16/20 Temporal clones have a modified slot 10, which is also a tier 1 marking. i came across a line that was modified back to the original RL's skin color, from i believe clouded to white, though i don't remember the specific date unfortunately, and no clone has the original skin color.

are they allowed to be advertised as RLCs if they can be reverted to that state with ease, or can they not at all? i could certainly understand not being able to count modified RLCs as such if breed-only attributes were removed/replaced, but what if they can be reverted, such as T0/T1/applicator markings being swapped with BO/RMA-exclusive markings or marking opacity changes?

i'm currently selling a clone of my aforementioned line and i'd prefer not to have to revert him if possible, as i think the RMA-exclusive markings make him more valuable and arguably prettier, but i can if necessary to advertise him as an rlc. is it okay if they're advertised as explicitly modified, not at all, or something else? thanks in advance. i just want to be absolutely certain ^^