1 |
|
---|---|
Posted by | Include Unweened Cubs as Part of a Trade |
ferrous π« leonid (#434371) Toxic View Forum Posts Posted on 2023-07-19 12:06:52 |
NOTE: there was ONE inactive, yet similar topic, but it was missing a big portion of the suggestion. Other then that, I couldn't find anything and this would be a big thing that would make mine and so many others' lives easier??? If this is somehow, indeed a duplicate, please let me know, but I searched pretty thoroughly. Alright, you know how many people will include a cub mother as part of a trade, as the cub itself is too young? We also know that those cubs aren't counted for "# of Lions in Trade", nor are they counted for "specific markings/base/eyes/mutation... etc", which can be annoying, as I have missed many a good deal as in reality it was the cub for trade, rather then the lioness itself, so it didn't show up in the filter. Another common issue is the person rolls over, the cubs are weened, and then the trade that is advertised as "SMILUS CUB WITH 3x DAWN AND DOVE EYES" (or whatever), is in reality just a boring NCL with no real value. That being said, the other part of this suggestion is if cubs are listed in a trade when unweened, they stay in the trade once weaned, just they are now separate, independent lions, rather then smol cubs. I hope you pledge support to this, or if not, please tell me why!! Thanks for reading :) |
EntityofSilo | G4 (#107570)
Ruthless View Forum Posts Posted on 2023-07-19 13:00:23 |
wybie !! πΏ (#241962)
View Forum Posts Posted on 2023-08-13 07:40:13 |
i can see this from kind of a yes and no perspective to be fair!! cause yeah i guess realistically, the cub would struggle but as a middle ground - perhaps putting up the unweaned cub instead of the mother, but the mother is included until the cub has been weaned? so if the trade has been up long enough for the cub to wean, it just automatically removes the mother since she's no longer needed ? i imagine thats still a little inconvenient but from experience it'll definitely be a lot less of a hassle than what it is at the moment hope this makes sense! honestly i support the idea regardless of how its executed! the realism argument is only half-hearted because the game HAS fantasy elements - cant hurt that much !! - editing bc i just noticed i misread and this is essentially what you'd suggested whoops LMFAO but yeah full support <3 0 players like this post! Like? Edited on 13/08/23 @ 07:43:43 by wybie (#241962) |
crunchy π (#329598)
View Forum Posts Posted on 2023-08-18 13:48:06 |
ferrous π« leonid (#434371)
Toxic View Forum Posts Posted on 2023-08-24 13:08:25 |
just putting it out there I'm so immature for this but I have to say it. 69 supports 1 player likes this post! Like? |
1 |
---|