|
1 |
|
|---|---|
| Posted by | Lower Minimum Stud Fee Prices |
 Nyladam (#250572) Lone Wanderer View Forum Posts  Posted on 2023-10-29 13:53:20 |
This one might have been suggested before, sorry if it has. So my King has a high stud price, 375sb. I hate having to give people some of their SB back because I might forget, I might send to little or too much, and just because he has 15 markings! I think it would be better to go off of if they have a mut, if its passable or not. Say there's a king with five rare markings and a pie. His minimum stud fee would be 125sb. That doesn't really make any sense to me, a king with a mutation, passable, and some rare, maybe BO markings for 125sb while my applicator king, with no mut, is sitting at 375? Maybe do 10sb per marking, so the coding wouldn't have to be changed much, and then from there the player can choose what they want it to be. Let me know what I can improve please! |
Report
|
Fraezer Account (#55800)
View Forum Posts Posted on 2023-10-29 14:31:54 |
Okay so, no support because the fact is, Lioden's market is almost entirely player-controlled, the stud fee thing was implemented I believe a while ago because people were getting rare/valuable markings and then studding out for minimum fee just to spite other players that may have spent hundreds of GB on getting that marking out there. Its the ONE aspect of the market that's regulated, and I really don't want that changing. Players dictate the currency price of lions, items during events, art,GB prices in the GB sales, etc, and sometimes it sucks really bad. Why would you want to expand that to the one safe, secure & stable income for a lot of players?  3 players like this post! Like?Edited on 29/10/23 @ 14:32:55 by Fraekinn {Fiery 2x Ros} (#55800) |
Corruptedhyena (#243378)
View Forum Posts Posted on 2023-10-29 16:04:37 |
Personally i think it should stay but i dont like the method of it. Like the only reason the min stud fee increases is the amount markings. If possible i would rather it actually reflect valuable bases and markings rather than just the amount of markings. Of course that seems super difficult (at least it seems to me) and is another suggestion, but i dont think a good response to the issues many have is to lower/remove it all together. 2 players like this post! Like?Edited on 29/10/23 @ 16:04:58 by Corruptedhyena (#243378) |
1 |
|---|
Memory Used: 625.04 KB - Queries: 2 - Query Time: 0.00139 - Total Time: 0.12471s