|
1 2 |
|
|---|---|
| Posted by | 'Queens of Jungle' Modifications |
 Axel (#6627) Pervert View Forum Posts  Posted on 2014-02-03 18:54:14 |
Hi there. It has come to my attention, that thanks to the new hunting system, the three Queen of Jungle leaderboards are basically containing the same lionesses... (only two are in just one category and one is in only two, the rest are in all three) I mean, there is no such thing anymore as 'unsuccessful' hunt. But also you get one-two stats per hunt, so you get as much stats as how many hunts you had. Which are of course always successful. Also exp is tied to it. The more you hunt, the more stats and exp you get..... Where is the diversity? So pretty much we have the same lionesses in: -Most successful hunts -Highest stats -Highest level (which is all the lioness leaderboards....) So I would suggest more diversity in the leaderboards so others have a chance to be displayed on it than just the same bunch on all three... However with what it should be extended... I dont know.... I just pointed out the problem... Feel free to suggest. Suggestions so far: - Most cubs bred (counting only those that made it to adulthood, with no GB items used to breed faster) - Most rare prey caught (Per account list) - Oldest Lionesses - Highest Level NCL - Maneater Lionesses (Hunting teams that bring the most human legs) - Most Successful at Protecting Cubs (once brood mothers come in) - Weekly Featured Lioness (Just a random list of lionesses, NCLs would be blocked from it) ---------------------------- Sub-Suggestion: There is also a problem with one category being ruled by basically two or maybe three people, even though there are 10 slots. I think all 10 slots should give the opportunity to display 10 accounts instead to give diversity and let more people be displayed there. It is annoying to be unable to get on the leaderboard because one person has their whole hunting party at Most Successful Hunts. So I have 3 suggestions: 1. Instead of lionesses, the account should be displayed, so people still get to show off their lions/Dens but it truly lets the Leaderboards display 10 people. 2. Only one lioness per account should be displayed. 3. Instead of listing lionesses separately, maybe there should be Hunting Parties listed. Enable us to make Hunting Parties and name these parties. |
Report
|
Axel (#6627)
Pervert View Forum Posts Posted on 2014-02-10 18:54:52 |
What I see as a problem at the Weekly-features lioness is that many claim NCLs for impression or just for the fun of it because they can.... and they might become featured as well ._.  0 players like this post! Like? |
|
Bracken (#3259)
Amiable View Forum Posts Posted on 2014-02-12 19:19:04 |
|
Bracken (#3259)
Amiable View Forum Posts Posted on 2014-02-12 19:26:53 |
Maybe if it can happen. The NCLs could be blocked from appearing.. or if a lioness gets chased off it no longer shows up? 0 players like this post! Like? |
|
Axel (#6627)
Pervert View Forum Posts Posted on 2014-02-12 19:29:05 |
But how would you do that? Block anything that is called 'Newly Claimed Lioness'? I am not sure if that is possible. But I will list that. 0 players like this post! Like? |
|
PaardindeMist (#7513)
Wicked View Forum Posts Posted on 2014-02-13 20:16:13 |
I think that at least one of the leaderboards could be "saved" : I suggested a while ago that we should have the hunting (not revamped) but modified a little bit so that we can see which lionesses brought down which prey again. Here is the thread if anyone is interested. I do agree though. I also feel like after a certain amount of inactivity, rather than have accounts/lionesses etc deleted, but no longer allow them on the leaderboards. Over half of the lionesses there are frozen on an inactive or intentionally frozen account, meaning that since we have the new hunting system, they won't be passed for many many generations and never die. :/ 0 players like this post! Like? |
|
Bilby [ROLLED 15th Nov] (#22017) Sapphic View Forum Posts Posted on 2014-02-13 20:42:35 |
Possibly it could apply to lionesses older than the NCL age group? I don't remember what the max. age for a NCL to be claimed at is, but if the random selection is taken from six months older than that, it should *hopefully* weed out a lot of the NCLs that get chased soon after. Doesn't particularly help with NCLs that are claimed, bred, and chased once their cubs turn one, but I'm trying dammit xD There's also the issue of it cutting off the lionesses below that age, but I'm not sure how else to do it x.o 0 players like this post! Like? |
|
Axel (#6627)
Pervert View Forum Posts Posted on 2014-02-25 21:23:25 |
|
PaardindeMist (#7513)
Wicked View Forum Posts Posted on 2014-02-25 21:27:55 |
I don't support number 2 - If you work your lionesses that hard you deserve your slot for as long as you can keep it. I still support number 1, though, freezing your side account so your girls don't die is vastly unfair to the people who can't get on the leaderboards, and while I don't want the lionesses to be deleted or anything, I don't think it's fair to have a 6 month period where unused lionesses are treated like they're still in-play. 0 players like this post! Like? |
|
Axel (#6627)
Pervert View Forum Posts Posted on 2014-02-25 21:31:58 |
It isnt exactly fair to have all your hunting party on it, while those who might be just a little lower than you are blocked from the leaderboard as well. I understand that you work for those lionesses, but if you think about it.... thanks to the new hunting system every lioness basically grows at the same speed in the pride, thus having all 5 displayed would be too easy and I can see that happen soon. What I see could help this situation would be to be able to assign lionesses to hunting parties, which then can be named and let those hunting parties be displayed. But the way it is now is highly unfair. 0 players like this post! Like? |
|
PaardindeMist (#7513)
Wicked View Forum Posts Posted on 2014-02-25 21:35:41 |
I don't see how it's unfair at all? Your lionesses don't grow at the same speed, at least not in the stats category, because not all lionesses are born with the same stats. I have stats ranging from 2600 down to 1700 on my 10 lionesses, and most of them were started at the same time. I already linked my thread for hunt counts being changed, but I do agree this is an issue, but only when it comes to lioness levels, since each lioness gains the same exp if hunted in a party. 0 players like this post! Like? |
|
Axel (#6627)
Pervert View Forum Posts Posted on 2014-02-25 21:43:34 |
I see it as unfair because I think it is enough glory to have your best lion of your account being displayed. Now think about those who have none displayed because 5 lionesses of the same account are blocking the leaderboards... I understand that you worked on them, but those are all the effort of one account. Plus,this suggestion might put an end to people storing all their lions on one account to be on the leaderboards forever. After all, it wont matter, since only one of the lionesses will be displayed. 0 players like this post! Like? |
|
Roka~Insane~(Wolfsea ) (#14648) Demonic View Forum Posts Posted on 2014-03-02 09:43:30 |
I'm personally in support of most cubs killed off by the mothers, aka chased because simply I want to see how many mothers are bad momma's out there because their cubs aren't pretty within the first 12 months of life. Why limit this to lionesses? Why not have a sub male board? Yes yes we know subs become main boys but my boy Imani has been a sub; born, raised and seems to be he'll die as a sub. Why not have it to where we support those boys as well who will never father cubs and will be there gathering items/stats and never put to use and make these boys worth something! 0 players like this post! Like? |
|
Trysa (#29191)
Famous View Forum Posts Posted on 2014-03-18 06:19:24 |
I support #1, but not sure about #2... I think if lioness roles are introduced to the game (ie. Queen), then this may be resolved. For now, I don't think it is fair to limit the representation of a player's hard work to just 2 lionesses, especially if that person worked dozens of lionesses (that is serious dedication that should be recognized). 0 players like this post! Like? |
|
Axel (#6627)
Pervert View Forum Posts Posted on 2014-03-18 06:53:36 |
Not just two lionesses. If more fit in any category, they would be displayed there too. The reason why I suggested is this: There are 10 slots for each category which actually should display competition between members. Right now, it displays competition within the pride of 2 people ._. I understand that they should be displayed, but the current setting isnt set up right. See: Highest level: 60% is owned by a single member. only two members own it. Successful hunts: 2 members own it. Highest stats: 70% is owned by a single member. Respectively: (slots/member count displayed) 10/2 (5:5 display) 10/3 (4:5:1 display) 10/4 (7:1:1:1 display) And considering the new hunting system, it just made it extremely easy to put a whole hunting party up there. And no, lionesses dont need special treatment or more effort. They work together, have the same successful hunts, gain the same stats, and gain the same exp, making individual display unnecessary as all 5 lionesses land on the same place anyway. Just take a look at the leaderboards and you will see. 0 players like this post! Like? |
1 2 |
|---|
Memory Used: 630.09 KB - Queries: 2 - Query Time: 0.00077 - Total Time: 0.00458s