|
1 |
|
|---|---|
| Posted by | Receiving the same mark x amount of times |
 🥭 gråbein 🥭 | G4 ice dorsal (#2988) Punk View Forum Posts  Posted on 2016-03-16 00:33:13 |
Suggestion: From marking applicators, decrease the likelihood of getting mark x on a lion that already has mark x, if not outright remove the possibility of getting doubles/triples/quadruples? I mean i'm willing to pay the site to remove 1 mark but i think 3+ is ridiculous. |
Report
|
Xojo (#85961)
Dreamboat of Ladies View Forum Posts Posted on 2016-03-16 00:39:29 |
Yeah, I think this is nice. I'm cheap so I don't usually buy the same applicator more than once but for those of you who do buy it more than once, this would be pretty helpful. I think removing the possibility all the way would be a tad unfair to the site, maybe just half the chances of getting the same mark would work out. For example, there's a 40% chance of getting this cruddy mark (that I made up), Balloon Face. You get Balloon Face and buy another marking applicator. Your chances to get Balloon Face are now halved, hence there's only a 20% chance of getting it. I feel like this is a more fair alternative.  0 players like this post! Like?Edited on 16/03/16 @ 07:40:09 by Xojo (3GB Left!) (#85961) |
|
gråbein v.2 | clean styx felis (#84045) Gigachad View Forum Posts Posted on 2016-03-16 00:58:02 |
Yeah i don't think removing it outright is something the site would do and i would be happy with just decreased chances :p 0 players like this post! Like?Edited on 16/03/16 @ 07:58:19 by gråbein (2nd acc) (#84045) |
|
xencorex (#37405)
Protector View Forum Posts Posted on 2016-03-16 00:59:22 |
|
Seiden 👑 (#31516)
Grumpy View Forum Posts Posted on 2016-04-16 23:54:39 |
|
Fart (#25392)
Holy View Forum Posts Posted on 2016-05-13 07:06:23 |
I agree with Seiden. It isn't unfair to receive a marking you don't want from a random marking applicator. It's just random. 0 players like this post! Like? |
1 |
|---|
Memory Used: 625.47 KB - Queries: 2 - Query Time: 0.00062 - Total Time: 0.00434s