|
|
---|---|
-LOCKED - Community Update #214! | |
Posted on 2024-01-26 21:41:35
Community UpdateAside from monthly event news posts and the 2nd Friday of each month being focused on art/coding updates, all other Fridays are centered around the community! Official Lioden RaffleLINK - This is our official community update raffle. Everyone gets a chance to win a rare prize, plus something extra for any runner ups. These raffles have a very minimal ticket price, and there is a limit of 1 ticket per account to make it fair! Good luck! This raffle will automatically end on 2024-02-02 00:00:00. Bug Fix* Fixed a longstanding issue where food items in clans would sometimes end up with extremely long expiration dates (730,000+ days). Any affected food should have their correct rotting times now. If you do come across any food that is set to expire far in the future, please let us know in the Bug Board! Raffle LionessCongrats to the winner of last week's raffle lioness! A new Hellebore lady with Bushveld Dorsal Line, Feline 4 Lilac, and the eighth Ashlands of Dabbahu Volcano background is up for impressing in the Special Lioness area linked here! Poll Results - Thank you all for voting on last week's poll! We're glad to see how well-received the new theme is! ATM NO POLL - How should we address February's encounters with awkward/mating animals? <- a debate started and a different conclusion was reached! Admin's post addressing feedback Note: If either option to adjust encounters wins, any updates to February's encounters will be done on February's Development Update and not February 1st! Next Development Update: February 9th! Friday goofy doodle comic: 118 players like this post! Like? Edited on 29/01/24 @ 13:22:10 by a Moderator |
Nanno (#460570)
Total Chad View Forum Posts Posted on 2024-01-27 02:33:13 |
Galaxy {G1 Solaris 2XRosette} (#351619) Necromancer View Forum Posts Posted on 2024-01-27 03:21:50 |
🕸️ Galaxy {G1 HELLEBORE} (#336030) King of the Jungle View Forum Posts Posted on 2024-01-27 03:31:31 |
Nightshade (#253628)
Pestilent View Forum Posts Posted on 2024-01-27 03:49:53 |
Ricky/Infinightive (#177615)
Deathlord of the Jungle View Forum Posts Posted on 2024-01-27 04:43:38 |
Also, saying that you just happen to dislike that singular unrealistic encounter but that same logic states that we shouldn't have all of these really cool bases we have. 3 players like this post! Like? |
Seiko (#263209)
Holy View Forum Posts Posted on 2024-01-27 04:53:13 |
~`JoltCraft`~ [G2Uneven3xRos] (#442785) Heavenly View Forum Posts Posted on 2024-01-27 05:00:19 |
☆☃️Snuhman🪼 ☆ g1 ambro VESSO (#244875) View Forum Posts Posted on 2024-01-27 05:39:51 |
I get the codes being old and it making hard to make a toggle. But instead of being dismissing SERIOUSLY, just say it. You are expecting the entire player base not to care about knowing what is going on but we DO. SO PLEASE. STOP NEVER GIVING US A REASON! Its simple. 1- we want a toggle, it shuts everyone up. 2- if you were to have said "due to old codes and the soon to be recode we cant right now" 3- we are willing to wait until after recode. Its that simple. we arent brainless people who are gonna yell "LIAR!" after you give an actual reason. In fact. This is pretty much the only valid reason to refuse a togglee in my opinion. But instead of being like "all or nothing!" You could have said "would you like some other options while we wait to see if it is possible to do after the recode?" Its simple, just one sentence, just be open. We want to know what is going on, what is being worked on and what isnt. So please next time dont treat us like we cant read, like we arent capable of understanding that some things are impossible to do at the moment. Some things go for jaglions, spirited pose and the recode: we want to know if its advencing. Literally 2 sentences, a small section describing the current work that is being done. We want updates on what we were promised because we are ACTUALLY invested in the game! Please, i am asking, give us updates. Thank you. 23 players like this post! Like? Edited on 27/01/24 @ 05:40:44 by 🦎Eli🦎G1Magpie|4ros (#244875) |
<°)))>< (#446681)
Confused View Forum Posts Posted on 2024-01-27 05:42:33 |
TobsterLobster (#456834)
King of the Jungle View Forum Posts Posted on 2024-01-27 05:44:15 |
Midnight (#248784)
Prince of Terror View Forum Posts Posted on 2024-01-27 06:07:29 |
Mad Hyena (#29080)
Necromancer View Forum Posts Posted on 2024-01-27 06:14:45 |
🦎Eli🦎, I disagree about coding being the only reason why toggle isnt an option, I have voiced my opinion on many topics about this, there's a very valid reason not to create a toggle precedent, so I wont repeat myself here, but I do agree; it would be nice if admins have voiced the reason why the toggle isnt an option. Stating an official reason; one thing is to hear a logic behind it from a guessing user, and the other, to recieve an official admin confirmation why toggle isnt a feasible thing to add to a game. Please talk to us, admins. Some people are feeling their concerns are not being answered, and need to hear an extended official explanation why it is the way it is. Hearing other users explain it does not seem to satisfy them. 1 player likes this post! Like? |
Mink (#176798)
Punk View Forum Posts Posted on 2024-01-27 06:18:20 |
Ricky/Infinightive (#177615)
Deathlord of the Jungle View Forum Posts Posted on 2024-01-27 06:20:20 |
@Mad hyena xylax just said that the toggle isnt able to be done because of coding, they never guessed about it? But also i see literally no issues with the toggle, it would be the best and simplest way to do it instead of having them have to keep removing encounters. first itll be februarys mating encounters [which aren't even that bad, i hate them myself but still], then it'll be the march encounters [they're there to server a purpose and should stay there, a toggle is a good way to remove it /blurr out the details], and whatever the fuck else people seem to cluster together to complain about on such a large scale that it makes it so they really dont see any other choice. Also not stating even a short reason why they aren't feasible and just saying 'they're not' isnt really helpful, im personally not going to go and find the explanations on other threads when it can be stated here by taking 2 seconds to briefly explain a point, as eli has. There are a ton of makings able to be removed if you select them in the marking censorship, so i really dont see the issue if it's a matter of 'oh but there will be so many'; thats the price of having such detailed things and awkward encounters, but the majority of the people who dislike the encounters want a toggle and ARE WILLING TO WAIT until the recode is done to see if its possible. If it genuinely isn't possible to create one with the recode, we're willing to accept that. 4 players like this post! Like? |
LolaBun (#235046)
View Forum Posts Posted on 2024-01-27 06:22:49 |