|
|
|
|---|---|
| Posted by | Update VLF Title |
 Dwalen |ｓｗｏｌｅ| (#148458) 
Impeccable View Forum Posts  Posted on 2018-08-03 07:24:44 |
I was revealing a Very Low fertility today (47%) when it hit me that the Very Low indicator covers 50% of the fertility scale. That's more (by far) than any other indicator, and the implications from one end to the other are vastly different. A 7% fertility doesn't have the same chances as a 47%, but they've got the same title. What I propose is a new fertility title that covers 1%-25%: Ultra Low. It's got the same general acronym shape as Very Low, but there's no mistaking what the fertility could be. It would be a simple change, leaving 26%-50% as Very Low. Any critiques or comments are welcome, this is my first suggestion so I'm sure there's plenty to improve! Supporter Suggestions: - Adding the fertility to the studding request (#104323) - Adjusting the entire scale: 1-25 VLF, 26-50 Low, 51-75 Average, 76-99 High (#58247) - Suggested titles: Critically Low Fertility, Direly Low Fertility (#162648) Extremely Low Fertility (!!) (#133826) 100 Supports on the first day! |
Report
|
[△] Nadir (#108458)
Prophet View Forum Posts Posted on 2018-08-08 07:56:37 |
No matter which direction this went - either Ultra Low being added, or the fertility spectrum being shifted entirely - I support.  0 players like this post! Like? |
|
Lady Argent (Clean/StM) (#146403)
Resurgent View Forum Posts Posted on 2018-08-09 14:49:31 |
I'm with Vincent here: I don't care which suggestion is approved, but either of them would be great. Either Very Low should only cover 26-50, or the whole range needs to be adjust. But the current way of it drives me nuts. 1000% supported. 0 players like this post! Like? |
|
Dwalen |ｓｗｏｌｅ| (#148458)
Impeccable View Forum Posts Posted on 2018-08-13 18:17:17 |
|
mousecouch🕷️ (#21960)
Buzzkill View Forum Posts Posted on 2018-08-14 10:56:59 |
|
wen ♥ (#87091)
Cursed View Forum Posts Posted on 2018-08-16 07:59:45 |
ahhhh I wish I could hit the support button multiple times yes, pleASE 0 players like this post! Like? |
|
🎠 opinicuss (#100335)
Nice Guy View Forum Posts Posted on 2018-08-19 19:16:17 |
ULF sounds weird so i agree w flyteck and firecracker,,,,, support so hard 0 players like this post! Like? |
Veni (#121432)
Interstellar View Forum Posts Posted on 2018-08-28 12:53:15 |
It never really made sense to me that one half of the fertility could fall into a single category while the other half was split into more understandable and clear categories. Support. 0 players like this post! Like? |
|
Galaxyloverminx (#99700)
Omega View Forum Posts Posted on 2018-08-30 14:27:55 |
|
EntityofSilo | G4 (#107570)
Interstellar View Forum Posts Posted on 2018-09-04 06:34:56 |
YES PLEASE. I haven't revealed the ferts of like half the girls in my pride because they're all VLF but half of them are super easy to breed. And then that leaves me with no one to stud to because I have to pay GB for a VLF and GAHH WHYY Support :) 0 players like this post! Like? |
|
Bwee (#153733)
Dreamboat of Ladies View Forum Posts Posted on 2018-09-08 22:19:03 |
I believe the reason why this is done this way is to prevent people from buying their way to muties with Vuka Vukas quite so easily. If you chop off 25% of that chance, the other options I bet from the admins' perspectives are to either remove Vuka Vukas entirely, or make it so you can't pick the lowest fertility range with them. Being able to pick the lowest 25% for your lioness and have a much higher chance of that being a 1% is just going to make muties more common and less special. To be honest, because I understand the current way, I'm in favor of it staying the way it is, and keeping it so that the lowest fertility lionesses are still very rare and hard to get, but we can actually still get them, with a bit of luck. Not to poo on your idea at all, but I did want you to know the reason why I chose not to support, and I think it might be important. (Might! I'm not that self-confident XD) 0 players like this post! Like? |
|
Katia (#134163)
True King View Forum Posts Posted on 2018-09-19 13:09:29 |
@Bwee I understand your thinking, but there is a bit of a problem with the logic of it. That problem is that the staff did release the hyena meat item which allows you to change a female's fertility to 1%. Since they did that, I find it rather unlikely that they would mess with Vuka Vuka. 0 players like this post! Like?Edited on 19/09/18 @ 13:09:51 by Katia (#134163) |
|
Bwee (#153733)
Dreamboat of Ladies View Forum Posts Posted on 2018-09-26 21:07:29 |
Oh wow, okay! I didn't know about that item. Welp, my point is moot then! Carry on XD *changes vote* 0 players like this post! Like? |
|
flyteck [G2 Ice Natural Pie] (#58247) Impeccable View Forum Posts Posted on 2018-09-27 11:42:29 |
It's not like low ferts sell for more money anyway, for the most part. It's not that much higher of a chance. But yeah, hyena meat exists already so not a big deal. 0 players like this post! Like? |
|
julius ☀️ he/they/it (#29928)
Bone Collector View Forum Posts Posted on 2018-09-27 16:26:12 |
i would love this SO much because then i don't have to debate whether or not to buy a vlf lioness incase her fertility is 47% instead of a lower number 0 players like this post! Like? |
|
hmlove1218 (#155828)
Blessed View Forum Posts Posted on 2018-09-28 12:15:47 |
I support, but would much rather just see the ranges shifted instead of adding in a new one. 0 players like this post! Like? |
Memory Used: 639.16 KB - Queries: 2 - Query Time: 0.00039 - Total Time: 0.00490s