|
|
---|---|
Posted by | Update VLF Title |
Dwalen |swole| (#148458) Impeccable View Forum Posts Posted on 2018-08-03 07:24:44 |
I was revealing a Very Low fertility today (47%) when it hit me that the Very Low indicator covers 50% of the fertility scale. That's more (by far) than any other indicator, and the implications from one end to the other are vastly different. A 7% fertility doesn't have the same chances as a 47%, but they've got the same title. What I propose is a new fertility title that covers 1%-25%: Ultra Low. It's got the same general acronym shape as Very Low, but there's no mistaking what the fertility could be. It would be a simple change, leaving 26%-50% as Very Low. Any critiques or comments are welcome, this is my first suggestion so I'm sure there's plenty to improve! Supporter Suggestions: - Adding the fertility to the studding request (#104323) - Adjusting the entire scale: 1-25 VLF, 26-50 Low, 51-75 Average, 76-99 High (#58247) - Suggested titles: Critically Low Fertility, Direly Low Fertility (#162648) Extremely Low Fertility (!!) (#133826) 100 Supports on the first day! |
🐇bunny🐇|uneven 2ros ruby (#156732) Sweetheart View Forum Posts Posted on 2019-01-15 14:22:47 |
Dwalen |swole| (#148458) Impeccable View Forum Posts Posted on 2019-01-15 14:35:26 |
That was a suggestion, and one I really like! Definitely better than ultra imo 0 players like this post! Like? |
🐇bunny🐇|uneven 2ros ruby (#156732) Sweetheart View Forum Posts Posted on 2019-01-15 14:36:44 |
Dwalen |swole| (#148458) Impeccable View Forum Posts Posted on 2019-01-15 14:38:43 |
It's totally fine!! Imagine how fun it would be to put ELF Friendly in stud reqs 0 players like this post! Like? |
🍁 Falconclaw 🍁 (#126244)
Sapphic View Forum Posts Posted on 2019-01-15 19:44:57 |
definitely - i have a couple of VLFs that are in the 50-30% range, and it usually takes kong’s only between 1-5 tries. would much rather have it labeled as low, very nice idea :) 0 players like this post! Like? |
🐝 Detective (#19805)
Protector View Forum Posts Posted on 2019-01-18 21:28:34 |
✨Jayden🌟{G2 Sidereal}⚡ (#150276) Aztec Knight View Forum Posts Posted on 2019-01-18 21:31:02 |
I like the idea of adding the ultra low instead of shifting Yknow why? Bcause studs will start to demand that you reveal low fert too and like I just don’t have all that sb man :( 0 players like this post! Like? |
Seranner (#75113)
Aztec Knight View Forum Posts Posted on 2019-01-19 12:29:09 |
sakkiye (#22325)
Sapphic View Forum Posts Posted on 2019-01-19 12:29:34 |
Tig!! (CLOUDED ANKH) (#65608)
Prince of Terror View Forum Posts Posted on 2019-01-31 20:39:06 |
This would be so helpful. It’s so dumb to have a 50 compared the same as a 1%. Totally different! Support. <3 0 players like this post! Like? |
MarvelousMoony {Android} (#134375) King of the Jungle View Forum Posts Posted on 2019-02-07 19:59:26 |
Katia (#134163)
True King View Forum Posts Posted on 2019-02-08 22:48:45 |
Honestly I'd support anything as long as VLF does not encompass 50% of the fertility scale. It's so annoying when you see a really pretty vlf for sale, but you don't want to take a risk on her being under 20% fert. 0 players like this post! Like? |
GalacticRing (#68231)
Harbinger View Forum Posts Posted on 2019-02-11 07:16:26 |
Ultra Low reminds me of some sort of extreme sports or some shit oml I admit I like the adjusted things in general that were suggested. I think I'd almost rather have the one that's completely adjusted but I, too, like the sound of ELF 0 players like this post! Like? |
Katia (#134163)
True King View Forum Posts Posted on 2019-03-09 18:48:02 |
Please I will beg for this. It would make buying lions so much easier as I don't want to risk buying an unrevealed vlf and getting a 5% 0 players like this post! Like? |
🔆london {G2 Rhodo-Echo} (#132549) Special Snowflake View Forum Posts Posted on 2019-03-23 17:44:03 |