|
|
|
|---|---|
| Posted by | -ADDED TO THE GAME-[Feb] Disinterested Lioness |
 _ (#125883) Resurgent View Forum Posts  Posted on 2019-01-22 20:50:15 |
I do my best to edit this with critique! |
Report
|
_ (#125883)
Resurgent View Forum Posts Posted on 2019-01-27 12:06:51 |
Hm, it didn't strike me that way. How about (minor changes)?: "You smirk and strut toward her, and start boasting about your... assets. She listens patiently, but, when you ask if she'd like to experience these for herself, tells you politely that she's not interested. Ah, well. She left you something for good luck!" (+1-2 HS) It makes "assets" more up-to-interpretation and has her not explicitly seeming 100% disinterested till the end. So, like, "our" offer seems less out-of-place  0 players like this post! Like?Edited on 27/01/19 @ 12:07:26 by Elliott (#125883) |
Berenos|On hiatus (#84593)
Resurgent View Forum Posts Posted on 2019-01-27 12:07:53 |
|
Bezthiel 🍉 (#81210)
Lone Wanderer View Forum Posts Posted on 2019-01-27 12:08:30 |
I dunno, and maybe I'm just an asshole in real life and don't realize it, but I can't see how that's worse than: "A lion approaches you, their tail swaying slowly in an almost alluring way. Looks confusing, but smells like a lady. It’s a very nice smell, actually. --It's a Babe! You instantly start to flirt, as the extra fluff doesn't bother you at all. She spends some time with you, but you decide that grooming her is a bit of a tongue twister and leave her be." You immediately flirt with this girl, and when she's physically displeasing, leave. 0 players like this post! Like? |
|
_ (#125883)
Resurgent View Forum Posts Posted on 2019-01-27 12:08:54 |
@Berenos Sure! Glad we could work to make it better. I do see the issue with us just walking up to a lioness and her thwapping us in the face. yguhbkl Mood, @Bezth... This isn't what you said, but I would 100% make another suggestion about us not having the option to misgender the Shaggy and the Maneless beebs, if it wouldn't cause an uproar. ygufghbjk 0 players like this post! Like?Edited on 27/01/19 @ 12:10:44 by Elliott (#125883) |
|
Bezthiel 🍉 (#81210)
Lone Wanderer View Forum Posts Posted on 2019-01-27 12:12:03 |
|
_ (#125883)
Resurgent View Forum Posts Posted on 2019-01-27 12:14:05 |
|
Fawn (#3654)
Deathlord of the Jungle View Forum Posts Posted on 2019-01-27 12:17:52 |
I must have missed that suggestion. I'll bet it was funnier then hell to read through the comments. 0 players like this post! Like? |
|
MarvelousMoony {Android} (#134375) King of the Jungle View Forum Posts Posted on 2019-01-28 09:45:58 |
Absolute support! It would be refreshing to see a lady who isn't sex-hungry despite the season; not everyone's DTF all the time haha! I can't see why this would be a problem, either. You get HS from both options, she's kind in both options, etc, etc. 0 players like this post! Like? |
Karmo (#98909)
Divine View Forum Posts Posted on 2019-01-28 19:05:21 |
Still would of supported for an asexual lioness ngl, but hell yeah support. Feb is one of my least favorite events due to all the flirting (flirting just makes me really uncomfortable, not an embarrassed way but a really unpleasant feeling way), so the idea of an npc not wanting to be flirted with is just great ^^ 0 players like this post! Like? |
|
_ (#125883)
Resurgent View Forum Posts Posted on 2019-01-28 19:12:36 |
|
TellyJart (#98565)
Prince of the Savannah View Forum Posts Posted on 2019-01-31 15:10:23 |
i dont think all the dislikes have to do with "bigotry", i think its the fact that these furries just want to see lions fuck for some reason. 0 players like this post! Like? |
|
Mashy (#67925)
Holy View Forum Posts Posted on 2019-01-31 19:58:28 |
I only don’t support because I’d rather have an encounter that fits the theme of feb, rather than one who doesn’t. We only get a few new encounters a year, and I’d rather have a new encounter with a flirty tigerbro or a leopon (or something else of that caliber) as it’s something we wouldn’t get to see anytime else. Sure, getting swarmed by horny dudes and ladies can get tiring after a few months, but that’s what feb is all about. There are encounters with a few lions who are not interested in you specifically, at least. I don’t hate the idea, just stating why I don’t support it. 0 players like this post! Like? |
|
A panicked, burning lion (#113568) Resurgent View Forum Posts Posted on 2019-01-31 20:11:42 |
I get what you were trying to do with this idea, but I think it would work better in the context of respecting "no" for an answer and the importance of consent. Otherwise, if she's the only disinterested lioness in the game, it implies that someone who turns down advances has to be aromantic. Just because a lioness finds kings attractive doesn't mean she always wants to be flirted with at the moment. Girls can turn down unwanted advances because they have the right to say no, not necessarily because of their sexuality. I think there should be some flavor text that touches on this subject, while remaining age-appropriate, of course. 0 players like this post! Like? |
|
_ (#125883)
Resurgent View Forum Posts Posted on 2019-01-31 20:14:10 |
It doesn't say anywhere that there's a romanticism involved for that reason. It's up for peoples' own interpretation. She could be straight/bi/pan/poly/etc and just not into you, monogamous & already taken, aromantic, a lesbian, asexual, etc 0 players like this post! Like?Edited on 03/02/19 @ 23:39:16 by Elliott (#125883) |
|
Tia (Sub) (#64146)
King of the Jungle View Forum Posts Posted on 2019-02-02 10:03:05 |
I rather this idea, Though i think it might also be nice to have a disinterested male too though, similar to your female idea or maybe one who is more down in the dumps whose spirits your lion can lift by just being a friend. Could come across him upset possibly because some of these heat driven females and sex hungry dudes have been offended, because he just wanted some "pleasant company" rather than a mating session 0 players like this post! Like?Edited on 02/02/19 @ 10:20:53 by Tia (Sub) (#64146) |
Memory Used: 631.68 KB - Queries: 2 - Query Time: 0.00083 - Total Time: 0.00497s