|
|
---|---|
Posted by | [++] Lower Fertilities in Lionesses |
Lukio (#7391) Deathlord of the Jungle View Forum Posts Posted on 2015-01-05 08:36:26 |
Hey everyone! |
Francxs -muts- (#35539)
Kind View Forum Posts Posted on 2015-01-05 08:39:40 |
Supporting, but curious as to how mutations will play into this. My only problem currently with the fertility is when I breed a very low fertility girl and get 4 cubs out of her. Like idek how that happened. But good point, you're right! 0 players like this post! Like? |
Lukio (#7391)
Deathlord of the Jungle View Forum Posts Posted on 2015-01-05 08:41:58 |
@Shyre I thought about that but I didn't really mention it in the body post. Very Low fertility girls will still have the best chance of getting mutations, it's just that the percentage levels will change. :) 0 players like this post! Like? |
Taiigee (#1127)
Deathlord of the Jungle View Forum Posts Posted on 2015-01-05 08:56:39 |
I support this, it doesn't make sense for a very low fertility lioness to have up to 50% fertility x3 0 players like this post! Like? |
Ciril {Int|3x Ros|Dusk} (#38439) Divine View Forum Posts Posted on 2015-01-05 13:23:18 |
Maku (#49080)
Prince of the Savannah View Forum Posts Posted on 2015-01-05 13:29:41 |
ambers. 🍊 (#15417)
Mean View Forum Posts Posted on 2015-01-05 13:58:58 |
I feel as if this is going to make the process of buying and breeding for cubs even more tedious than it already is. No support. 0 players like this post! Like? |
Lukio (#7391)
Deathlord of the Jungle View Forum Posts Posted on 2015-01-05 14:47:59 |
I must disagree because the higher fertilities are meant to be very rare while average would be that: average. So, in my opinion, it could even increase the worth of some cubs with high fertilities. 0 players like this post! Like? |
Shu [Side] (#41038)
Impeccable View Forum Posts Posted on 2015-01-05 14:52:17 |
Support! This would definitely help with the cub market as well: lioden has already put measures in the past to improve cub markets, and with this, if the average lioness if going to be hard to breed, people are going to be less willing to spend the time to breed their less valued lionesses and therefore reduce the number of cubs in the market. 0 players like this post! Like? |
Lukio (#7391)
Deathlord of the Jungle View Forum Posts Posted on 2015-01-05 14:59:53 |
cheetah >.< (#38280)
Remarkable View Forum Posts Posted on 2015-01-06 12:48:25 |
Awesome! Total support here! The idea is so well thought out as well, perks to you! 0 players like this post! Like? |
Lukio (#7391)
Deathlord of the Jungle View Forum Posts Posted on 2015-01-06 12:48:49 |
Sphinx | Regal Sepia (#50934)
View Forum Posts Posted on 2015-01-06 17:05:01 |
I support. I'm somewhat iffy on the passing rates for the coat colors as real life fertility doesn't really have much to do with that, but I do think that Very Low should be a lot less than 50%. I was kind of shocked when I saw that. 0 players like this post! Like? |
Lukio (#7391)
Deathlord of the Jungle View Forum Posts Posted on 2015-01-06 17:11:19 |
@Sphinx I am not suggesting *any* changes to the coat passing rates. I was only using the mechanics behind them as an example. ^,^ Thank you! 0 players like this post! Like? |
Unova, Rebellion's overseer (#51172) King of the Jungle View Forum Posts Posted on 2015-01-06 17:13:45 |
I support, though I can't see how fertility and base inheritance have anything to do with each other. 0 players like this post! Like? |
Lukio (#7391)
Deathlord of the Jungle View Forum Posts Posted on 2015-01-06 18:46:34 |
Thank you Sarabi, and you're right, they have nothing to do with each other. I was only using the *mechanics* behind coat inheritance to try and explain my idea. I have edited the main post to try and alleviate some of the confusion. ^,^ 0 players like this post! Like? |