imo, at the end of the day it's begging dressed up as a game or a "challenge". i'm sure there's a place for it, it's just not the tc.

You have liked this post!

I have to say I am in the support side of this situation. These trades have been getting abundant and frankly I was waiting for it to die off after awhile. Let’s be honest there is absolutely nothing actually worth 1 SB the ratio between GB and SB has too big of a gap. So like others have said: let there be a limit of either 100 or lower SB to sell something to prevent these sorts of trades. While this is a full player based economy system and everyone is free to price things how they want. It’s still ridiculous how people can try and get good items from this sort of “challenge.” As an excuse to beg on the game. Enforcing a rule that these aren’t allowed goes again the whole TC ability to price things however they want. They know they can price something at 1 SB and it’s impossible for someone to get banned for using what you are able to do now.

Not only that but this whole trend could potentially be dangerous if the user does not state it as a challenge. The newbie or naive person could give them something they would know easily know it’s worth thinking it’s something silly while they regret giving into the trade afterwards. Like I said nothing is truly worth 1 SB so it’s easy for new players to get wrapped up into this thinking it’s a good method of getting items than selling things normally. That’s why I worry about these trades because I always seen them as a scummy scam to get people to donate items to you for 1 SB. People who contribute to these challenges are a problem in itself when people fall into their hands. These are also extremely spammy since they can easily be placed for trade so people can spam the TC for it. There has been a huge influx of these type these trades to the point that it is directly affecting the trading center's ease of use and player's overall enjoyment. And that’s when it starts becoming a major problem. And I am not the only one who thinks this way.

You have liked this post!

It's dead

You have liked this post!

No not really I just seen several not too long ago lol :/

You have liked this post!

Yeah but nobody really cares about them anymore, it's a dying trend, sooner or later it will just disappear. So there's no need to fuss about it

You have liked this post!

It's not really a dying trend if they are still popping up. I see numerous still, to the point where it's too many to block.

You have liked this post!

Yeah my guy I think it's just you, I don't see any??

You have liked this post!

Well then, maybe it's *you*? Dynamite literally just said they'd seen the same...

You have liked this post!

Taken 5 seconds ago:

You have liked this post!

Yeahhh no, 13 pages and still no sign of them

You have liked this post!

Support, I’ve been seeing a lot of them and it’s getting annoying- at first I hoped it was just one player so I could block them and never see those trades again- turns out it’s a lot of different players doing it :/

You have liked this post!

I don't like seeing 1sb to ___ trades, 'what can i get' trades, etc. It incredibly annoying. but as someone that does not like those trades specifically- no support to this. I will explain why, but will not be replying to anyone that wants to argue it, as I am just replying to the main post only.

There is no way to enforce limiting trading. if "1sb to [goal]" gets banned, then people will just do "2sb to [goal]", then 3 to goal, etc. It's not viable at all. Worth is not enforceable, as it is only dictated between the person that wants to sell something and the person that wants to buy what they are selling. Worth is completely a construct through and through, and therefore doesn't exist at all to begin with, and is abstract and not enforceable. If we also start policing worth through trades then it introduces administrative subjective judgement between what is worth, and what isn't worth, and would be decided on case-to-case basis, which would be different for every judge, which is a BIG waste of time for administration. These trades can be ignored / blocked and will disappear within the 30 days time the trade is up. In conclusion, what is and isn't spam is subjective, because worth is subjective, and therefore not enforceable, just like whether or not a lion is 'clean' or not, it is ultimately up to the individuals and their agreed upon transaction between pixels and pixel points.

You have liked this post!

Someone literally just sent a screenshot of them still existing and yet you keep denying that nobody cares about them @ Honeynectar. People are allowed to still can have genuine concern about them especially since it could possibly be a danger from my perspective. I am not fussing about anything I have every right to express my issue on this matter. It’s not just a trend that’s going on if this many people support this suggestion and think it’s a glaring problem. So it’s not just a “trend” as you think it is. :|

You have liked this post!

And not only that if so many people do not care about them then what is that support to no support ratio? Your argument just does not make any sense to me.

You have liked this post!

All those suggestions came when the challenge was in its prime, where you would see WAY more of them than right now, of course they will still appear, but it doesn't mean it's still a popular trend.

You have liked this post!