To those who are referring to reusing designs: I find, with the current voting system, that it gets really annoying when I've voted for a design and it pops up again. And it isn't similar, it's the exact same. I understand that the prices are high but it seems a bit unfair to people who enter once. I feel that if you want to enter twice, you should have to come up with a new design or don't do it. Imo it feels as lazy and annoying as those who submit a background or blank lion. I have a feeling that the people who 'submit designs that don't match the theme' are ones who tried to enter the previous round at the last second. There maybe are people who are purposely doing it but I think the majority of people aren't.

Edit: typos. I hope I don't come off as passive aggressive. I just want to voice my concerns.

You have liked this post!

nebula/ferrous 💫🧬 giftsback!: I understand your concern but if they showed everyone's at the same time, people will pick different designs. You wouldn't be able to see what other people voted for until after. I have played games where that was the case and most people got atleast 1 vote. Yes, there were people who didn't get voted for that round but there isn't just one round. Everyone has a strong theme and a weak theme.

You have liked this post!

i know that, but the issue is people not getting a chance
if they're all shown at once, then everybody gets a chance

You have liked this post!

Isn’t that a good thing if everyone gets a chance? I'm really confused.

You have liked this post!

yeah? sorry if that wasn't clear

You have liked this post!

Not sure if this was already suggested, but I just want to point out the glam garnet situation.

Today I got both 4th and 6th places. They gave me the same amount of glam garnets even a person that got 194th place would get, 1. I was one place (two stars) off from being on the leaderboard and I still got just 1. That sudden change from 1 to 5 or 6 isn't good. I'm still super bummed about it because I was so close and I still only got 1 :(

You have liked this post!

I think I'm starting to agree that the amount of garnets awarded should be changed. Maybe have the 1st place winner get 10gg, the 2nd place winner get 8gg, the third place winner get 6gg, and then award 4-5gg to the top 10-20, 3gg to the top 50, 2gg to the top 100, 1gg to the rest. Just as an example/suggestion.

You have liked this post!

nebula/ferrous 💫🧬 giftsback!: Then why did you say 'if they're all shown at once, then everybody gets a chance'? From what you told me, it's a good thing to show everyone's at the same time as everyone gets a chance. The other alternative that someone suggested (which could work) is a 'this or that' situation where each design is paired up and you vote for one. I hope I don't come off as nasty or argumentative, I'm just curious about other people's opinions.

You have liked this post!

because you said " I understand your concern but if they showed everyone's at the same time, people will pick different designs."

my concern with the current thing is that not everybody gets a chance

what does the different designs being picked have to do with what i said?
my post was about how with the current system, only one is shown at a time, meaning some peoples' won't get shown as many times because not everybody will go through and vote every single one, so the people that don't get shown to as many people automatically don't get as many votes

You have liked this post!

If someone spends most of the hour designing an entry their proud of, then hell yeah they should be able to submit it twice if they want to. It's not lazy, they put the effort in and made the design. Nobody is forced to submit on only one account just like nobody is forced to submit on both. If people want to create a new design on both accounts, more power to them, that is their choice and their way to play. If they want to make one design and submit twice, that's also their choice. Players with less time deserve to play the game just as much as those who have the ability to stare at wardrobe for hours a day. Calling them lazy doesn't help anybody. It is literally part of the code of conduct not to dictate how other people play the game, why can't that extend to a mini game? I'm not talking about the blank wardrobe link though honestly I could not care less about people who do that, I'm just talking about people who submit the same design twice for whatever reason they choose to do so. If you find it annoying and you don't like it, vote the second one 1 star and move on. It doesn't hurt anybody to let them play the game in the way that is easiest for them. Not everything has to be this massive "only people with the time / drive to do xyz deserve ANYTHING WHATSOEVER!!!!"

You have liked this post!

Oh, I thought it was about my suggestion. I am very sorry that I interpreted that wrong. I do agree that everyone should get a chance and that the current system is bad. It does drag and I know for me it gets boring which leads to more sloppy voting. Again I am very sorry for misinterpreting your post and wasting your time.

You have liked this post!

oh, it's totally fine!
nah i wasn't responding to anybody :sob: that was an original unlinked thought

You have liked this post!

If not already suggested:

Possible other prizes other than decor ie I am loving that those green markings are an option even if I wont use them

You have liked this post!

Fix where lions disappear plzz

You have liked this post!

Would love an option to be able to move decor PNGs, might take some coding too do I dont know - would be able to be more creative with it.

You have liked this post!